PUBLIC EV CHARGING STATIONS - IN SEARCH OF A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

As electric vehicles (EVs) become increasingly popular, the demand for public charging stations has surged. This has led to heightened competition among service providers, with pricing strategies playing a crucial role in attracting and retaining customers. In this article, we will delve into the dynamics of electricity pricing in Lithuania for May, comparing fixed and dynamic pricing models, and analyzing their impact on the competitiveness of public EV charging stations.

Understanding competition

Competition among electric vehicle (EV) charger operators is intense on multiple fronts.

o Firstly, providers compete against each other by offering competitive pricing models, service quality, and convenient locations to attract EV owners. Dynamic pricing, which adjusts rates based on factors like demand and time of day, helps operators optimize utilization and offer attractive rates during off-peak hours.

o Secondly, public EV charging competes with the convenience and lower cost of home charging. Public stations must offer faster charging speeds and competitive price to attract customers, balancing affordability and convenience against the backdrop of dynamic pricing strategies.

Analysis of Electricity Prices for End Users in May 2024

Electricity prices in Lithuania for May can be found on the Ignitis website, which provides comprehensive data on electricity costs for end users. In May, the average price for electricity in Lithuania was influenced by several factors, including wholesale market prices, transmission and distribution costs, and taxes.

For May 2024, the “Standard” electricity price for end users in Lithuania was approximately 17,69 cents per kilowatt-hour (EUR/kWh), excluding VAT. With a VAT rate of 21%, the total cost per kWh for end users rose to approximately 21,40 cents. These rates can fluctuate based on market conditions and regulatory changes, but they provide a baseline for comparing fixed and dynamic pricing models in the context of public EV charging.

Example of Fixed Prices in Lithuania for End Users (06/07/2024)

Analysis of Electricity Average Price of Nord Pool in May 2024

The Nord Pool power market, which serves the Nordic and Baltic countries, provides valuable insights into wholesale electricity prices. According to data from Nord Pool, the average electricity price on the Nord Pool market for May 2024 was around 75,85 EUR/MWh. When adjusted for VAT (21%), the price rises to approximately 91,77 EUR/MWh or 9,18 cents per kWh.

Nord Pool prices by months

This lower wholesale price highlights the potential benefits of dynamic pricing models, where electricity costs for EV charging stations can be adjusted based on real-time market prices. Dynamic pricing allows charging station operators to purchase electricity at lower prices during off-peak hours, potentially passing on these savings to consumers.

Analysis of Stuart Energy Business Clients Using Nord Pool Dynamic Pricing

Stuart Energy, a key player in the EV charging market, has adopted Nord Pool's dynamic pricing model for its business clients. This approach enables them to take advantage of fluctuating wholesale prices to offer competitive rates to their customers. The uploaded data provides a snapshot of how dynamic pricing impacts Stuart Energy's business clients.

Stuart Energy's Pricing Strategy

To make public EV charging business profitable and eliminate losses, Stuart Energy incorporates several additional charges into their pricing model. These extras include:

Start Price: An initial fee applied at the beginning of a charging session.

Fallback Price per kW: A set price per kilowatt-hour used when dynamic pricing is not advantageous.

Static Price per kW: A consistent rate applied regardless of market fluctuations.

Margin Percentage: A profit margin added to the overall cost.

Stuart Energy EV charging management system

Typically, these additions raise the final price to customers by about 30%-40%. This pricing strategy ensures that Stuart Energy can cover operational costs and maintain profitability, even when market prices fluctuate.

Comparing Fixed and Dynamic Pricing Models with Stuart Energy

The comparison between fixed and dynamic pricing models for public EV charging stations reveals several key points:

Cost Efficiency: Dynamic pricing models, like those used by Stuart Energy, can lead to lower overall electricity costs by capitalizing on market fluctuations. In contrast, fixed pricing models lock in rates, which can be beneficial in times of rising prices but may lead to higher costs during periods of low market prices.

Consumer Attraction: EV users are increasingly savvy about electricity costs and are likely to be attracted to charging stations that offer lower prices during off-peak hours. Dynamic pricing can thus be a significant competitive advantage.

Revenue Stability: Fixed pricing provides predictability in revenue for charging station operators, which can be important for financial planning. However, the potential for higher profit margins with dynamic pricing, when managed effectively, may outweigh this benefit.

Potential Savings to End Users Using Dynamic Pricing at Public Charging Station vs Charging at Home using Fixed Price Model

To illustrate the potential savings for EV owners using dynamic pricing, let's consider the following scenario: An EV with a 60-kWh battery and an average consumption rate of 15 kWh per 100 km. Assuming the EV owner drives 100 km per day, the daily electricity consumption would be 15 kWh.

o Fixed Pricing Scenario:

Average end-user price in May (including VAT): 21.40 cents per kWh

Daily cost: 15 kWh * 21.40 cents = 3.21 EUR

Monthly cost: 3.21 EUR * 31 days = 99.51 EUR

o Dynamic Pricing Scenario:

Average Nord Pool price in May (including VAT): 9.18 cents per kWh

Additional charges (40%): 9.18 cents * 1.40 = 12.85 cents per kWh

Daily cost: 15 kWh * 12.85 cents = 1.93 EUR

Monthly cost: 1.93 EUR * 31 days = 59.83 EUR

o By using dynamic pricing, the EV owner could save:

Monthly savings: 99.51 EUR - 59.83 EUR = 39.68 EUR

Annual savings: 39.68 EUR * 12 months = 476.16 EUR

These calculations demonstrate that dynamic pricing can lead to substantial savings for EV owners, making it a compelling option for those looking to reduce their charging costs.

Potential Savings to End Users Using Dynamic Pricing at Public Charging Station vs Charging at Public Charging Station with Fixed Price model

There are the results of using the same scenario as it was described above, the fixed charging price of public EV charging stations and dynamic pricing model.

o Fixed Pricing at Public Charging Station Scenario:

Average end-user price in May (including VAT): 35 cents per kWh

Daily cost: 15 kWh * 35 cents = 5.25 EUR

Monthly cost: 5.25 EUR * 31 days = 162.75 EUR

o Dynamic Pricing Scenario:

Average Nord Pool price in May (including VAT): 9.18 cents per kWh

Additional charges (40%): 9.18 cents * 1.40 = 12.85 cents per kWh

Daily cost: 15 kWh * 12.85 cents = 1.93 EUR

Monthly cost: 1.93 EUR * 31 days = 59.83 EUR

o By using dynamic pricing, the EV owner could save:

Monthly savings: 162,75 EUR - 59.83 EUR = 102.92 EUR

Annual savings: 102.92 EUR * 12 months = 1235.04 EUR

These calculations demonstrate that dynamic pricing can lead to substantial savings for EV owners, making it a compelling option for those looking to reduce their charging costs.

Conclusion

As electric vehicles (EVs) gain popularity, the demand for public charging stations is on the rise, intensifying competition among service providers. Pricing strategies play a critical role in attracting and retaining customers, with dynamic pricing models proving advantageous due to their ability to adapt to fluctuating electricity costs. In Lithuania, the comparison between fixed and dynamic pricing models for EV charging stations highlights significant cost efficiencies and potential savings for consumers. Dynamic pricing not only offers lower rates during off-peak hours but also supports sustainability by encouraging the use of renewable energy sources when available. It's important to note that the specific prices used in this analysis serve to illustrate the formulas and the business logic behind pricing strategies. Actual prices can fluctuate based on market conditions and regulatory changes, impacting the competitiveness of public EV charging stations. As the market evolves, public EV charging stations adopting dynamic pricing models are likely to gain a competitive edge, appealing to cost-conscious consumers seeking reliable and affordable charging solutions.

You might also be interested in these
Mastering EV Charging Load Management with Stuart Energy

As electric vehicles (EVs) continue their rapid ascent in popularity, the need for efficient and reliable EV charging infrastructure becomes increasingly critical. The heart of this infrastructure lies in effective load management. At Stuart Energy, we understand the complexities and challenges faced by this burgeoning market, and we're dedicated to providing state-of-the-art solutions to ensure a seamless charging experience.
Wallbox Supernova DC Charger: Comprehensive Testing Insights

In our in-depth evaluation of the Wallbox Supernova DC Charger, we examined a range of critical parameters to assess its performance and functionality. One of the key aspects we scrutinized was its compatibility and adherence to industry standards, with a particular focus on OCPP 1.6 support, connector count, and CCS (Combined Charging System) capabilities. In this article, we delve into the results of these tests to provide a clear understanding of the Wallbox Supernova's capabilities.